SoLiXG:Digital and green transition: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{solixgkeyword}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{solixgkeyword}}</noinclude> | ||
== | == Twin transition == | ||
In response to climate change, governments are | In response to climate change urgencies, governments are combining increased digitisation efforts with plans for a greener future.<ref>“Policy Brief No. 111 - Twin Transition for Global Value Chains: Green and Digital.” UNCTAD, July 2023.</ref> For example The EU<ref>“Green Digital Sector: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future.” The European Commission, May 24, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/green-digital.</ref>, Switzerland<ref>FOEN, Federal Office for the Environment. “Long-Term Climate Strategy to 2050.”, March 2023</ref> and the UK<ref>GOV.UK. “Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener,” April 5, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/net-zero-strategy.</ref> have issued policy frameworks promoting the "twin digital and green transition" as part of their commitment to [[SoLiXG:Key-concepts#Net-zero|Net-Zero]]. By adding a digital layer on top of common [[SoLiXG:Key-concepts#Infrastructure|infrastructures]] such as mobility, energy, healthcare and education, these infrastructures are claimed to become more easy to configure and monitor and therefore optimise resource use. Investments are made in for example blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies because they "could be used in material tracing, promising to aid the circular economy by better maintenance and recycling”.<ref>“Green Digital Sector: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future.” The European Commission, May 24, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/green-digital.</ref> 'Digital Twins', virtual models based on large amounts of captured data, "can model, among others, traffic, to optimize traffic flows, reduce jams and slash emissions in the process.”<ref>“Green Digital Sector: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future.” The European Commission, May 24, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/green-digital.</ref> What is often left out of such propositions is how the ''twin transition'' is itself resource intensive, as it relies heavily on Artificial Intelligence for deciding what is efficient. It increases the need for computation, and therefore additional data centers need to be built which consume electricity, clean water, arable land and metals. The reliance on digital technologies for basic public infrastructures might also create issues with privacy and security, and reshape governance structures as dependencies on Big Tech players increase and decision making processes are informed by algorithms. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Anna:''' Could think of making a keyword on ''Twin Transition'' and then having this text. I like it. | '''Anna:''' Could think of making a keyword on ''Twin Transition'' and then having this text. I like it. | ||
'''Femke''' reworked as ''Twin transition'' | |||
Latest revision as of 07:00, 19 March 2024
Twin transition
In response to climate change urgencies, governments are combining increased digitisation efforts with plans for a greener future.[1] For example The EU[2], Switzerland[3] and the UK[4] have issued policy frameworks promoting the "twin digital and green transition" as part of their commitment to Net-Zero. By adding a digital layer on top of common infrastructures such as mobility, energy, healthcare and education, these infrastructures are claimed to become more easy to configure and monitor and therefore optimise resource use. Investments are made in for example blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies because they "could be used in material tracing, promising to aid the circular economy by better maintenance and recycling”.[5] 'Digital Twins', virtual models based on large amounts of captured data, "can model, among others, traffic, to optimize traffic flows, reduce jams and slash emissions in the process.”[6] What is often left out of such propositions is how the twin transition is itself resource intensive, as it relies heavily on Artificial Intelligence for deciding what is efficient. It increases the need for computation, and therefore additional data centers need to be built which consume electricity, clean water, arable land and metals. The reliance on digital technologies for basic public infrastructures might also create issues with privacy and security, and reshape governance structures as dependencies on Big Tech players increase and decision making processes are informed by algorithms.
Anna: Could think of making a keyword on Twin Transition and then having this text. I like it.
Femke reworked as Twin transition
- ↑ “Policy Brief No. 111 - Twin Transition for Global Value Chains: Green and Digital.” UNCTAD, July 2023.
- ↑ “Green Digital Sector: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future.” The European Commission, May 24, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/green-digital.
- ↑ FOEN, Federal Office for the Environment. “Long-Term Climate Strategy to 2050.”, March 2023
- ↑ GOV.UK. “Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener,” April 5, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/net-zero-strategy.
- ↑ “Green Digital Sector: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future.” The European Commission, May 24, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/green-digital.
- ↑ “Green Digital Sector: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future.” The European Commission, May 24, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/green-digital.